P Ricketts
I think that Pete Ricketts should change his name to something more hip, like I dunno, "P Ricketts." It would sound cool, and make an association in the minds of young, "with it" people to Sean "P Diddy" Combs. Or he could just shorten it to "P RICK," like when Sean Combs went from "Puff Daddy" to " P Diddy."
Wait. Maybe that's not such a good idea. See, I was just thinking about this in my head, but now that I see "P RICK" spelled out on screen, it looks kinda bad... So, just forget the whole thing. We wouldn't want to give people the wrong impression now would we?
In all seriousness, this guy continues to piss me off. Anybody who declares himslf a "Reagan Republican," at the beginning of their newest campaign commercial, while simultaneously continuing to support the policies of the current administration in fighting against things like embryonic stem cell research deserves to be called out. I mean, even Nancy Reagan is for stem cell research, and you can't get much more "Reagan Republican" than that.
Ricketts' new spot, Protect Our Values, is ridiculous. In fact, I think that Ricketts has reached a new level of ridiculousness, that as I have made the case before, was already a pretty high bar. In the new ad, Ricketts begins by saying:
"I'm Pete Ricketts. I approve this message because as a Reagan Republican, I know Washington politicians have abandoned our conservative values of low taxes and limited government."
It's very rare for the first two sentences out of a politicians mouth to kill their rest of their ad for me. Honestly, all it takes these days is seeing Pete Ricketts face to get me fuming, let alone anything he might say. But lets dissect this first sentence, shall we? First, I'm not exactly sure what a Reagan Republican actually is. I'm sure that's it's a term used to harken back to the bygone era of the '80s where everything was just peachy. I'll admit that the optimism and pride in America that the Reagan administration embodied were good for the country, and I'll even concede that some of his policies may have helped bring about the end of the Cold War. He saw the United States as a "shining city on a hill," the light of the world. Which it was. Unless you happened to live at the lower end of the economic spectrum, or I don't know, have AIDS. According to the Statistical Abstract of the United States for 1996, the number of people (white, black, and Hispanic) below the poverty level increased in almost every year between 1981 (31.8 million) and 1992 (39.3 million). And I'm not blaming AIDS on Mr. Reagan, but according to Dartmouth Professor Michael Bronski, AIDS was first reported in 1981 and wasn't addressed by the President until 1987 and by that time 59,572 people had been diagnosed with AIDS and 27,909 had died from it. Add all of that to the fact that national debt exploded from $930 billion in 1981 to $2.6 trillion in 1988, and I'm having a hard time seeing what's so great about being a Reagan Republican. Maybe it's a case of believing in the ideals that something represents, rather than the actual practice, much along the lines of how I feel about this country of ours, but with Ricketts I somehow doubt it.
Moving right along, Ricketts claims we have "abandoned our conservative values of low taxes and limited government." I agree that we have abandoned the ideal of limited government. I totally agree that the Executive now has way too much power, trampling the Constitution whenever it sees fit and committing violations from domestic spying to suspending habeas corpus. But what the hell is Ricketts talking about when he says we are abandoning low taxes? Where has he been since G.W. Bush took office? Hello, tax cuts? Tax cuts even during a time of "war?" Tax cuts that when combined with the money we are spending on the "war" have helped raise the deficit to an astronomical $8.4 trillion? Tax cuts that "have contributed to revenues dropping in 2004 to the lowest level as a share of the economy since 1950, and have been a major contributor to the dramatic shift from large projected budget surpluses to projected deficits as far as the eye can see?" Tax cuts that benefit the wealthy, averaging $44,293 a year for the top 1 percent, while having a negligible effect on average families who end up receiving only about $227 in relief? Tax cuts that have shifted federal tax payments from the richest Americans to a wide swath of middle-class families? What about those tax cuts Pete? Good Lord, you cut taxes any more, and I do not want to see the outcome. As it stands, guys like Pete Ricketts will continue to get richer and richer and almost everybody else in Nebraska will be left father and farther behind. People like you and me. Tell me again how that's in step with "Nebraska Values?"
You still with me? Good. Now, the next part of his ad is downright hilarious. The ad switches from a close up of Ricketts' hairless dome to a shot of DC with Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton super-imposed over the top. Ricketts' voiceover proclaims:
"A Democrat Senate controlled by Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton promises an agenda of higher taxes, more government spending, and liberal judges."
First of all, is Pete Ricketts running against Hillary Clinton and/or Ted Kennedy? Look, I have no particular love for these two either, so to be fair to Pete, I'll call them names, too. How about Hillary "White Water" Clinton and Ted "Brown Liquor" Kennedy? The fact remains, however, that Ricketts IS NOT running against White Water and/or Brown Liquor, he's running against Ben Nelson. Second, are either White Water or Brown Liquor in control of the Senate? No, it's controlled by Republican Majority Leader Bill Frist. And even if the control of the Senate swings to the Dems in the next election, wouldn't Minority Leader
So, as you can see Ricketts continues to pull stuff out of his ass. No facts, just conjecture. He continues to mislead and even managed to mangle the Constitution. Great job, Pete. If he can do all of that in a 30 second spot, imagine what he can do while serving our state in Congress! Win or lose, I can hardly wait until the next election, so I won't have to see Ricketts' ads any more.